User talk:Mainehaven
Query in Devil Dinosaur article
[edit]Hey,
I've copied and pasted your query about bibliographies in a more appropriate place where you'll get more of a response instead of possibly waiting a while longer than most. It's here. Cheers RIANZ 19:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Stellaris
[edit]Hey, nice work on the Stellaris and Centurius articles. :) What others sorts of characters would you be interested in working on? I can find some for you if you like. BOZ (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- There's always Ajak, of course. Eternals in general have always had a big involvement with Celestials. Many of the Celestials have their own articles which could use some improvement.BOZ (talk) 19:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I kind of figured Stellaris was going to be re-redirected again. Probably best to leave it that way. :\ BOZ (talk) 01:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- More of the latter, but he's not unique. :) More editors than not on the Wikiproject Comics will leave well enough alone regarding minor characters that lack such sources. I'll figure something out for Stellaris eventually, but let's just leave that redirect alone in the meantime. BOZ (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Fixed our little problem. :) I'll suggest never editing the previous version againt, and definitely do not redirect it to the new one. BOZ (talk) 03:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- It's probably just wise to leave well enough alone. There might be a way though, but I don't want our good article to get deleted. BOZ (talk) 23:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
[edit]You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:
|
![]() |
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere:
|
![]() |
Message delivered by Dominic·t 20:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/97/Wikipedia_Day_2013_Topeka.png/220px-Wikipedia_Day_2013_Topeka.png)
Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.
If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.
Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devil Dinosaur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- a brief teleportation to modern day Earth.<ref>''Devil Dinosaur'' #1-9 (April – December 1978)''')</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mainehaven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mainehaven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moon-Boy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moon Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mainehaven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your Red Skull edits
[edit]They were from like over 7 years ago, but just as a clarification, Captain America Comics #7 from 1941 does not name or mention Johann Schmidt at all. He is not introduced at all, and Johann does not accuse him of being a pawn in this issue. He was always George Maxon or other people in the 1940's and 1950's. Your attempts at a clean up completely altered historical facts of the article that have stood the test of time for 7 years. Writers in the 1980's altered the facts in something we call retroactive continuity. It has now been clarified in the publication history section of Red Skull. Rickyar (talk) 01:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)